Managing intellectual property protection in organisations: case study of Lubuskie Voivodeship, Poland

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56652/ejmss2025.1-2.7

Keywords:

Intellectual property management, SMEs, Lubuskie Voivodeship, IP support model, commercialisation

Abstract

This article analyses the state of intellectual property (IP) protection management in Polish enterprises, using the Lubuskie Voivodeship as a case study. Based on a survey of 27 firms in a technology-oriented business district, the study demonstrates that, despite a relatively high level of awareness of institutions responsible for IP protection, the practical use and strategic integration of intellectual property into management processes remain limited. The findings indicate that only a small proportion of enterprises actively incorporate IP into managerial decision-making, focusing primarily on traditional forms of protection such as trademarks and inventions. The identified barriers include insufficient organisational resources, limited competencies, and a lack of systematic legal support. In response to these conditions, the article proposes a multi-stage, pro-innovative support model for small and medium-sized enterprises, covering the process from intellectual property auditing and risk assessment to strategy implementation and commercialisation. The conclusions suggest that systematic education and the strengthening of regional support structures are key prerequisites for transforming intellectual property potential into a sustainable competitive advantage at the regional level.

References

Białek-Jaworska, A., Teterycz, A., Sichel, R., & Woźniak, M. (2023). IP box effects in the gaming industry. Central European Management Journal, 31(3), 291–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-12-2021-0143

Clayton, T., et al. (2023). Enhancing intellectual property use for a stronger innovation ecosystem in Poland. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 138. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/42e389fa-en

Dereń, A. M., & Skonieczny, J. (2023). Strategic activities in the area of intellectual property management in the enterprise. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 790, 506–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45021-1_38

Jankowska, M. (2023). Intellectual property rights, copynorm and the fashion industry: A comparative analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376033

Marchenko, O., & Dombrovska, O. (2024). Intellectual property protection in Poland: Legal framework and enforcement challenges. Information and Communications Technology Law, 33(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2024-2-67-76

Robotko, S., Topalov, A., Lukashova, V., Zaytsev, V., & Zaytsev, D. (2023). A machine learning study on world economic impact of intellectual property rights on GDP growth with a focus on Poland. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT 2023) (pp. 261–264). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT58437.2023.10275475

Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Lubuskiego. (2021). Diagnoza Programu Rozwoju Innowacji Województwa Lubuskiego do roku 2030. Zielona Góra.

Urząd Statystyczny w Zielonej Górze. (2024). Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w województwie lubuskim w latach 2020–2022. Zielona Góra.

Veugelers, R., & Harhoff, D. (2023). New options for patenting in Europe. Science, 381(6654), 111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj6400

Wyczik, J. (2024). Ownership in the 21st century: Property law of digital assets. Information & Communications Technology Law, 34(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2024.2408917

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Golysheva, I., & Tutaj, J. (2025). Managing intellectual property protection in organisations: case study of Lubuskie Voivodeship, Poland. European Journal of Management and Social Science, 6(1-2), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.56652/ejmss2025.1-2.7

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.